博客來 好書好物狂銷

Making Icons：Repetition and the Female Image in Japanese Cinema, 1945–1964流行趨勢 博客來

博客來網路書店博客來 One distinctive feature of post-war Japanese cinema is the frequent recurrence of imagistic and narrative tropes and formulaic characterizations in female representations. These repetitions are important, Jennifer Coates asserts, because sentiments and behaviours forbidden during the war and post-war social and political changes were often articulated by or through the female image. Moving across major character types, from mothers to daughters, and schoolteachers to streetwalkers, Making Icons studies the role of the media in shaping the attitudes of the general public. Japanese cinema after the defeat is shown to be an important ground where social experiences were explored, reworked, and eventually accepted or rejected by the audience emotionally invested in these repetitive materials.

An examination of 600 films produced and distributed between 1945 and 1964, as well as numerous Japanese-language sources, forms the basis of this rigorous study. Making Icons draws on an art-historical iconographic analysis to explain how viewers derive meanings from images during this peak period of film production and attendance in Japan.

博客來網路書店歡迎您博客來書店博客來網路書局
博客來

• 已追蹤作者：[ 修改 ]

  確定 取消
  作者： Jennifer Coates    新功能介紹
• 出版社：香港大學出版社    新功能介紹
• 出版日期：2016/12/16
• 語言：英文

商品訊息功能:

Making Icons：Repetition and the Female Image in Japanese Cinema, 1945–1964流行趨勢

內容來自YAHOO新聞

新移民染愛滋 疾管署不補助惹議

【台灣醒報記者黃譯萱台北報導】疾管署竟通過歧視人權法案？疾管署去年12月修正愛滋病預防及治療補助辦法，竟將外籍配偶和移工排除在外，意味新移民若感染愛滋必須自費看病。對此，人權公約施行監督聯盟召集人黃嵩立27日怒批「違反人權」、「疾管署帶頭歧視」，而立委林淑芬也質疑這項作法只會擴大防疫漏洞。

疾管署104年12月公布「人類免疫缺乏病毒檢驗預防及治療費用給付辦法」修正版本，將本來對愛滋病患的治療補助範圍限縮，若新移民配偶愛滋感染者及外籍移工「遭本國配偶或因醫療照護而傳染」，要在兩年後才能領到健保補助，意即這些新移民若因與本國愛滋病患配偶發生危險性行為、或因醫療輸血等疏失被感染，兩年內都必須自費看病。

對此，立委林淑芬及人權團體27日召開記者會痛批這是「人權待遇分等級」，指出外籍配偶在家庭關係上常是弱勢，許多新移民女性根本無力要求有愛滋病的先生進行規律治療，更遑論要做好安全性行為。此外，台灣女人連線黃淑英也質疑，「因醫療照護而傳染」根本是「國家醫療問題」，「怎麼會要感染者自行買單？」

另外，雖然一般新移民感染愛滋病不補助，但若新移民女性已懷孕，為了避免母子垂直感染，疾管署仍提供補助治療，但此等差別待遇也被批評是「將女人當成生產工具」、「母以子貴」的歧視性待遇。

疾管署副署長周志浩則解釋，在資源有限情況下，只能以國人為優先補助範圍，並強調做出此決議結果已經過委員會討論，並曾參考美國的作法。但此話一出立刻引發人權團體痛批，「美國是健保福利最爛的國家，怎麼會去參考美國？」

林淑芬強調，公務預算本應以防疫為核心精神，若這些新移民患者無法得到妥善治療，只會造成防疫更大的漏洞，指出疾管署不應用「公務預算優先適用國人」這種說法，就忽略兩年內未受補助者可能放棄治療，反而擴大傳染給他人，導致更多醫療支出。

周志浩則表示，感染愛滋的新移民總數並不多，大約在200人上下，但承諾會針對爭議重新研議。

新聞來源https://tw.news.yahoo.com/新移民染愛滋-疾管署不補助惹議-053601746.html

Making Icons：Repetition and the Female Image in Japanese Cinema, 1945–1964流行趨勢推薦，Making Icons：Repetition and the Female Image in Japanese Cinema, 1945–1964流行趨勢討論，Making Icons：Repetition and the Female Image in Japanese Cinema, 1945–1964流行趨勢比較評比，Making Icons：Repetition and the Female Image in Japanese Cinema, 1945–1964流行趨勢開箱文，Making Icons：Repetition and the Female Image in Japanese Cinema, 1945–1964流行趨勢部落客
Making Icons：Repetition and the Female Image in Japanese Cinema, 1945–1964流行趨勢那裡買，Making Icons：Repetition and the Female Image in Japanese Cinema, 1945–1964流行趨勢價格，Making Icons：Repetition and the Female Image in Japanese Cinema, 1945–1964流行趨勢特賣會，Making Icons：Repetition and the Female Image in Japanese Cinema, 1945–1964流行趨勢評比，Making Icons：Repetition and the Female Image in Japanese Cinema, 1945–1964流行趨勢部落客 推薦

Making Icons：Repetition and the Female Image in Japanese Cinema, 1945–1964流行趨勢